Saturday, September 29, 2007
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
Coke and Mentos experiments by Eepy Bird had been a great buzz with one movie having been watched over 5 million times just on Revver in the 5-6 weeks following May, 31st 2006, while Grobe and Voltz, the creators, appeared on TV shows like "The Late Show with David Letterman" and NBC's "Today". Interestingly a couple of guys are trying to piggy-back on the success of the Coke and Mentos stint to generate some buzz for Carlsberg.
- erodes its relational capital with customers and local communities,
- drives intense reactions from competitors and regulators and,
- probably leads to some form of complacency and arrogance of its personnel, who may end up believing that whatever they release will end up being bought by a market taken hostage by their employer.
In a recent comment on this blog, the idea that LinkedIn could (should?) become a sort of central repository of professional identity, especially if job sites were to embrace LinkedIn as their solution in lieu of their résumé builders. Interesting idea isn't it? David hits it on the nail... again. He also provides a link to a good post in O'Reilly Radar.
Monday, September 24, 2007
Anyway, there is quite a lot of interesting stuff going on in Europe although it is nowhere near the entrepreneurial frenzy of North America.
Saturday, September 22, 2007
Friday, September 21, 2007
The success of Facebook as a networking tool is a fact that is amply demonstrated by the incredible rate of adoption of the tool around the globe. As part of my ongoing work to remain as current as possible with the wonderful stuff happening in this world in our technological era, I opened an account to try Facebook. The features that allow a member to locate other members with whom she may have something in common from high-school attended to looking for a relationship are just great and seem to be working very well indeed. For example, I was able to identify people who were at my high-school in Athens back in the eighties, although the fact that their profiles had disappeared by the second time I logged into Facebook leads me to the (perhaps erroneous) conclusion that there must be quite some churn on this platform. That's pretty much where my positive experience with Facebook ends and that has nothing to do with the platform itself but perhaps more with the fact that I am no longer a student or a young overworked professional and not particularly looking for a relationship, friendship or "random play" (whatever that is) through Facebook...
However, what struck me in this experiment is the abnormally high number of people I know from professional contexts who invited me to join their company's or their professional network's "Group". Sometimes the Groups were not that active and at other times I got a very strong feeling of utter weirdness when checking out the profiles of the people who invited me only to discover that they were stating an interest in "women" and looking for "anything they can get" (which can be quite a risky statement since I suspect there are quite a few things one can but would not get); all that left me wondering about the relevance of that part of their profile in a professional context. And then I noticed that some of those people were actually investing energy in building "communities" and "groups" in other platforms as well and I wonder about the return and business relevance of such activities, especially when carried out on platforms with such heteregeneous groups of users. I will just add that these developments occur on platforms which are often without any business model to sustain
them in the longer run and that actually means that there is a risk for
the continued availability of users' data and thus for the return they can expect from their efforts to build their groups or communities.
All of this brings me to the conclusion that the frontier between interesting social networking experiments and complete business nonsense is sometimes easily crossed. Today it does seem that many social networking platforms are just too broad trying to be all things to all sorts of people and I believe there is going to be some pretty dramatic consolidation and specialization in this field too. The following simple facts also seem to be getting lost from sight in all the frantic agitation around social networking:
- networking is not a technical matter, in the sense that when people simply apply "recipes" and techniques extracted from some "Networking for dummies" without engaging emotionally in the web of human relationships they seek to develop, then it just does not work. I still remember how a guy I met early in my career started all of a sudden calling me and sending me wishes on my birthday years after we had lost contact: can you feel the awkwardness of the situation?
- networking is not a technological matter: it's not about building mighty databases and finding correlations or common fields of interest provided in formatted profiles. Technology can support the process, but it cannot replace human contact and relationships, which is one of the reasons why I like the way LinkedIn has been able to combine technology and a process involving introductions by common acquaintances and perhaps why I find Facebook is doing too much in the way of identifying members with common characteristics;
Perhaps a Facebook for business should emerge and combine a carefully chosen subset of its features with a platform like LinkedIn... Just an idea to finish this rant and move to something else.
Thursday, September 20, 2007
Well, it takes more than a mere glance to exploit the data in the OECD report, but if you are in the business of education or e-learning like one of my customers in Luxembourg then it's well worth poring over this document.
Something I found quite interesting is the break-down between capital expenditure and current expenditure in primary and secondary education in a bunch of countries studied by the OECD (click on chart for details). Interestingly the US, Norway, Greece, South Korea, Luxembourg and Turkey are allocating significantly over 9% (about the OECD average) of their spending in capital expenditure. I wonder whether that means that these countries are investing more seriously in computing and networking equipment for educational purposes, which I would find great. Now of course the question remains whether these countries have a strategy for national education and R&D and I think Singapore is a great role model for that. If you want to get a feel for the clarity and thrust of their plans regarding education, this page of Singapore's Ministry of Finance is quite interesting to read. Probably an example to follow for several European governments.
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
There's been quite a lot of content produced to show how the adoption of affordable multimedia devices and the advent of a multimedia online environment such as today's Internet are key enablers for creating and distributing new content. Sometimes though these means can be used to give new life to existing and sometimes forgotten material, which can be quite excellent. This Schweppes ad with John Cleese is a good example, which also shows that contrary to what was happening in the old world of media, today
content has a staying power (and that has enormous implications for specific forms of online marketing and for the business case behind certain types of campaigns such as those delivered by BuzzParadise) because:
- once made available on a major platform it remains available,
- it becomes searchable and reusable,
- thus enabling further creative production.
In fact it is almost as though we were building a huge virtual mind on a global scale that is capable of keeping track of almost everything that ever went through it and to use that material to generate new stuff. And of course, the antiquated copyright system is an obstacle to such productivity, which is one of the reasons why I think Creative Commons is also a great enabler of creativity.
Thursday, September 6, 2007